Tamara Sorenson Duncan & Johanne Paradis

Is younger always better for second language acquisition?

When it comes to learning a second language, it is a common assumption that younger is better. However, this belief has not stood up to empirical investigations of bilingual development. For immigrant and refugee children, early introduction of English can undermine bilingualism by jeopardising their first language. Furthermore, older children tend to learn a second language more rapidly than their younger peers and not the reverse. As further evidence against this old adage, we will present data from 89 immigrant and refugee children who are at the onset of their schooling in Canada. These data revealed that foreign-born children, as well as older children, have advantages both in their first language (L1) and in English (i.e., achieved higher L1 scores and performed better on an English narrative task). As such, these findings further call into question the push to introduce English as early as possible for preschool-aged newcomer children. Earlier may not always result in the expected benefits for children’s English development and indeed may come at a great cost to children’s first language skills.

You can access the author’s recent presentation from the 1st Annual Conference on Child Language Acquisition Research in Alberta (CLARA) here

Huge thanks and goodbye to our fabulous Q-Step summer intern. Millie helped push our projects on in all sorts of wa… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

RT @Literacy_Trust: There’s no better way to keep your child’s development going over the summer holidays than reading. Visit your loca… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Calling all parents of children with #asd. If your child is 3-7 yrs old and has #autism please consider taking part… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…